SOURCES SOUGHT: Y1BG-Expand and Renovate EHRM upgrades

The Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is conducting a market survey and is seeking qualified firms to provide professional Construction Services to Y1BG-Expand and Renovate EHRM (Electronic Health Records Management Infrastructure) Upgrades at Chalmers P. Wylie Veterans Outpatient Clinic – Columbus, OH. The contractor shall completely prepare the site for building operations, including demolition and removal of existing structures/equipment, and furnish labor and materials and perform work to expand and renovate space for Electronic Health Records Management Infrastructure Upgrades at the Chalmers P. Wylie Veterans Outpatient Clinic – Columbus, OH, as required by drawings and specifications. This project shall include, but is not be limited electrical work, and other items as contained within the construction documents. This project has been designed to replace the existing fiber backbone and terminations as well as providing a redundant fiber network for the Chalmers P. Wylie Ambulatory Care Center in Columbus, OH. In addition to the telecommunications work there will be new critical power specialized receptacles and normal power general purpose receptacles installed in telecommunication rooms throughout the facility.

  • Original Set Aside:
  • Product Service Code: Y1BG – CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRONIC AND COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
  • NAICS Code: 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
  • Place of Performance:Chalmers P. Wylie Veterans Outpatient Clinic , OH 43219 USA
  • Updated Response Date: Jan 21, 2022 02:00 pm MST

Full details via beta.sam.gov


Joshua Duvall: The Value and Importance of Debriefings

Ever heard of the word “debriefing”? If you haven’t, it’s time you are made aware of the value and importance of debriefings to your small business’s success.

It is a requirement by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) that agencies debrief unsuccessful offerors upon written request. 

Despite the government’s efforts to create productive interactions with its industry partners, many misconceptions have been discouraging people from taking advantage of this tool. 

The last thing we want for you is to be in a situation where you wish you could’ve done something but weren’t able to because you lacked the information.

So learn from Joshua Duvall as he talks about debriefings and how you can use them as leverage in creating business relationships in the federal industry.

BACKGROUND

Joshua Duvall is the founder and managing partner of Matross Edwards LLC, a Washington, DC-based government contracts and cybersecurity law firm serving government contractors nationwide.

Joshua is a trusted counsel and outside general counsel to small and mid-size government contractors. He counsels clients in complex government contracts, including bid protests (agency level, GAO, COFC), disputes, teaming agreements, subcontracts, joint ventures, regulatory compliance, and cybersecurity. 

Joshua received his law degree from The George Washington University Law School and is a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP).

He has a blog, GovConJudicata.com, which provides news, insights, and legal analysis for anyone interested in staying current with government contracts and cybersecurity issues.

WHAT DEBRIEFINGS ARE REALLY FOR

It’s time we change the negative preconceived notions on debriefings. Joshua shares that there are only two ways people should look at debriefings: information gathering and relationship building. 

In the commercial sense, you can’t build a relationship with the private company after you’ve lost the procurement. They will not even explain why you lost.

In government contracts, however, you can learn what went wrong with the procurement through debriefings.  

You can use this time to leverage your expertise and build a relationship with the agency so that they can, after you’ve lost the procurement, consider you in future opportunities. 

“If you’ve received a notice of unsuccessful, they (the procurement officers) are anticipating it on their end. For a contractor to not avail that opportunity, they’ve lost the opportunity to learn what they lost and to put themselves in front of agency personnel.”

Debriefings are not supposed to be adversarial. When you lose the bid, that does not mean that it is the end of your government contracting journey. It could very well be the start, depending on your mindset.

BID PROTESTS

An effective debriefing process can significantly reduce protests, as protests are often driven by a desire to obtain additional information. If the government is exerting its efforts in conducting effective debriefings, why do people file bid protests?

According to data in the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress, the most common reason why unsuccessful offerors file protests is related to issues with the evaluation criteria in the solicitation. 

Although offerors have access to the evaluation criteria, they often lack insight into how the source selection officials assessed the proposal’s strengths and weaknesses.

At a base level, protest is just a written objection. The question is then, “what are you challenging?”

PRE-AWARDS vs. POST-AWARDS

There are two buckets when it comes to protests; Pre-awards and Post-awards. 

1. Pre-Awards

For the pre-awards side, it’s usually challenging the solicitation terms, like the use of ambiguous or internally inconsistent terms. You could also challenge unreasonable evaluation methods. 

A protest that challenges the terms of a solicitation must be filed before the time for receipt of initial proposals.

2. Post-Awards

As for the post-awards side, if you’re the unsuccessful offeror, you’re usually challenging an unreasonable technical evaluation, unreasonable past performance evaluation, cost evaluation, and unequal treatment.

The key phrase when it comes to post-awards protests is objective flaws trump subjective flaws. So you should be pointing out objective procedural flaws.

3 PLACES YOU CAN PROTEST

The U.S. Congress authorizes three forums for bid protests, and the applicable legal procedures and available remedies vary considerably under each level.

1. Agency Level Protest

Agency-level protests are filed with the contracting officer or any other agency official designated to receive bid protests for that agency

This level is most commonly known as the least expensive route for protests because often when you’ve filed for the protest, you are just waiting for the result.

While a protest is pending, the protestors can benefit from an “automatic stay” that bars an agency from awarding or implementing a contract.

Generally, protests before the procuring agency and GAO, as well, tend to be resolved faster and less expensively because they are not subject to specific resolution timetables and formal procedures. 

2. Government Accountability Office (GAO)

In GAO protests, you’re dealing with agency attorneys and GAO attorneys in the middle. 

Although GAO is a little more expensive because you have a little more briefing involved, its procedures have similarities to the agency-level protest.

Protests with GAO also benefit from an “automatic stay,” and GAO bid protest recommendations are not legally binding. However, since GAO is a legislative entity, its decisions are called “recommendations.” 

3. U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC)

Unlike the first two, filing a protest with the COFC is frequently more time-consuming and expensive and does not trigger an automatic stay. 

Moreover, Protests under the COFC can result in legally binding and conclusive judicial decisions and orders.

The interested parties that disagree with GAO or procuring agency decisions can still bring claims before the COFC. However, the reverse route is generally not permitted.

When you go to the Court of Federal Claims and don’t get the result you want, you can appeal to the US. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.            

RESOURCES

If you want to learn more about Joshua Duvall’s experiences and insights learned along the way, then be sure to click the resources below. You can also visit the GovCon Giant website or the new GovCon Edu, where you learn everything about government contracting!

94: How to use Government Debriefing to Win Contracts – Joshua Duvall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggO435e7NVc&t=264s

Jo-Kell Inc. Awarded $11M for UH-60A helicopter special purpose electrical cable assembly spare parts

Jo-Kell Inc.,** Chesapeake, Virginia, has been awarded a maximum $11,103,552 indefinite-quantity, firm-fixed-price long-term contract for UH-60A helicopter special purpose electrical cable assembly spare parts. This was a sole-source acquisition using justification 10 U.S. Code 2304 (c)(1), as stated in Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. This is a five-year contract with no option periods. Location of performance is Virginia, with a Nov. 29, 2026, performance completion date. Using military service is Army. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2021 through 2026 defense working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Richmond, Virginia (SPE4A6-21-D-0036).

Jo-Kell Inc. is located in Chesapeake, VA, United States and is part of the Household Appliances and Electrical and Electronic Goods Merchant Wholesalers Industry. Jo-Kell Inc. has 94 total employees across all of its locations and generates $96.32 million in sales (USD). There are 5 companies in the Jo-Kell Inc. corporate family.(www.dnb.com)

 

SOURCES SOUGHT: C1DZ–El Paso VA Health Care System EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 10.002(b)(2), this Sources Sought Notice is for market research and information purposes only at this time and shall not be construed as a solicitation or as an obligation on the part of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is conducting a market survey and is seeking qualified Architect-Engineering (A-E) firms to provide Architect/Engineer (A/E) services to design a construction project at the El Paso (VAHCS) VA Health Care System in accordance with this design scope of work. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A/E Part One Services (also known as Design Phase) for this design project includes site visits, field investigation, studies and user interviews to prepare drawings, specifications and cost estimates for all facets of work and disciplines/trades to facilitate a construction project to upgrade the facility infrastructure to support the new Electronic Health Record Modernization (EHRM) system in accordance with VA OEHRM Site Infrastructure Requirements (provided by VHA).

  • Original Set Aside: Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside (FAR 19.14)
  • Product Service Code: C1DZ – ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: OTHER HOSPITAL BUILDINGS
  • NAICS Code: 541310 – Architectural Services
  • Place of Performance: El Paso VA Health Care System , TX 79930 USA
  • Original Response Date: Nov 26, 2021 02:00 pm EST

Full details via beta.sam.gov


 

 

SOURCE SOUGHT: Waterways Commerce Cutter (WCC) Cutter Boat

The U.S. C.G. is conducting a Sources Sought Market Survey in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 10 to identify potential firms that have the skills, experience, knowledge, and capabilities required to perform the following potential requirements as potential solutions to outfit the Waterways Commerce Cutters (WCC) with cutter boats: This Request for Information (RFI) is designed to help the Coast Guard make informed decisions regarding potential solutions to outfit the Waterways Commerce Cutters (WCC) with cutter boats. A single-design cutter boat is needed to support the 30 new WCCs in completing their various missions, including aids to navigation (ATON); search and rescue (SAR); ports, waterways, and coastal security (PWCS); marine environmental protection (MEP); and marine safety (MS). The WCC fleet will consist of River Buoy Tenders (up to 180 feet length overall (LOA)), Inland Construction Tenders (up to 160 feet LOA), and Inland Buoy Tenders (up to 120 feet LOA). The U.S. Coast Guard intends to outfit each River Buoy Tender with two (2) cutter boats and each Inland Construction Tender and Inland Buoy Tender with one (1) cutter boat, totaling up to 56 cutter boats, including spare hulls, over approximately ten (10) years.

  • Original Set Aside: Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)
  • Original Response Date: Nov 01, 2021 11:00 am EDT
  • Product Service Code: 1940 – SMALL CRAFT
  • NAICS Code: 336612 – Boat Building
  • Place of Performance: USA

Full details via beta.sam.gov


Bell Boeing Joint Program Office awarded $143.1M contract N00383-19-D-U501 for the logistics and repair support of MV-22B, CMV-22 (Navy) and CV-22 (Air Force) Osprey components

Bell Boeing Joint Program Office, California, Maryland, is awarded $143,198,723 for a delivery order (N00383-21-F-0U51) under previously awarded performance-based logistics requirements contract N00383-19-D-U501 for the logistics and repair support of MV-22B, CMV-22 (Navy), and CV-22 (Air Force) Osprey components. All work will be performed in Fort Worth, Texas. Work is expected to be completed by December 2025. Fiscal 2021 working capital funds (Navy) in the full amount of $143,198,723 will be obligated at the time of award and funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. One source was solicited for this non-competitive requirement pursuant to the authority set forth in 10 U.S. Code 2304 (c)(1), in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1, with one offer received. Naval Supply Systems Command Weapon Systems Support, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is the contracting activity.

Bell Boeing Joint Project Office was founded in 1981. The Company’s line of business includes the manufacturing and assembling of complete aircraft. (www.bloomberg.com)

 

Raytheon Technologies awarded $88.8M contract under solicitation SPE7MX-20-R-0130 for various consumable electronic components

Raytheon Technologies, Fairdale, Kentucky (SPE7MX-21-D-0057, $88,800,000); and Raytheon Technologies, Indianapolis, Indiana (SPE7MX-21-D-0058, $24,000,000), have each been awarded a firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract under solicitation SPE7MX-20-R-0130 for various consumable electronic components. These were sole-source acquisitions using justification 10 U.S. Code 2304 (c)(1), as stated in Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1. They are three-year base contracts with one three-year option period and one four-year option period. Locations of performance are Kentucky and Indiana, with April 1, 2024, ordering period end date. Using customers are Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, Navy, and foreign military services worldwide. The type of appropriation is fiscal 2021 through 2024 defense working capital funds and foreign military sales. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Columbus, Ohio. (Awarded April 1, 2021)

Raytheon Technologies Corporation operates as an aircraft manufacturing company. The Company focuses on technology offerings and engineering teams to deliver innovative solutions such as aerostructures, avionics, interiors, mechanical systems, mission systems, aircraft engines, power and control systems, radars, software, and other products. (www.bloomberg.com)

SOURCES SOUGHT: Multiple Award Indefinite Quantity/Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) Contract with Design/Build Capabilities for Central and Western Pennsylvania Federal Acquisition Regulation

Per Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.201(e), responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. Responses do not affect a potential offeror’s ability to respond to any future synopsis/solicitation. The Government will not provide reimbursement for any information that may be submitted in response to this notice. Respondents are solely responsible for all expenses associated with responding to this notice. This sources sought notice is a market survey being conducted solely to determine whether there are adequate Small Business contractors for the following proposed procurement.

  • Original Set Aside: Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)
  • Product Service Code: Z2AA – REPAIR OR ALTERATION OF OFFICE BUILDINGS
  • NAICS Code: 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
  • Place of Performance: PA, USA
  • Original Response Date: Apr 21, 2021 12:01 pm EDT

Full details via beta.sam.gov


govcon giants logo Check out our RESOURCES page for a sample letter that we use in response to government market research.

Federal Contracting Process: A Guide Before Working with the Government

Working with the federal government is quite different than working with private entities. There are certain processes and rules to follow. So, here is a guide to help you understand the federal contracting process. 

WHAT MAKES GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS DIFFERENT?

Federal contracts are highly regulated to encourage competition, guarantee the proper use of the taxpayer’s money, and promote healthy socio economic goals. 

Each contract also contains mandatory clauses that enable the government to have special rights within the contract.

It includes being able to change its terms and conditions and even end it.

Then, claims and legal actions from contractors should also follow the procedures of the Contract Disputes Act because the federal government is a sovereign entity. 

WHAT GOVERNED FEDERAL CONTRACTS?

Federal contracts are subject to several statutes including the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act and the Competition in Contracting Act while its procurement process for executive branches is also governed by the Federal Property Administrative Act and the Armed Services Procurement Act.

Due to these, the federal government developed a body of administrative law to address all of these through the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).

Other agencies such as the NASA, the General Services Administration, and the Department of Defense also created supplements on this regulation in pursuit of the Administrative Procedure Act.

WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER?

A contract will not be bound without the authority of a contracting officer.

In order to follow the rules governing the contracts, an executive agency issues a warrant or a certificate of appointment to a contracting officer to grant, manage, or terminate a given contract. 

These warrants may either be a warrant with a specific amount of money or an unlimited warrant that is used for various contracting opportunities.

WHAT IS THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS?

Once the government agency provides a warrant to a contracting officer, this person moves to the next phase which can be either through sealed bidding or negotiation. 

When the contracting officer chose sealed bidding, he or she directly advertised an Invitation for Bids, read the bid to the public, and chose the lowest responsive bidder. However, if one of the conditions for the sealed bidding is not met or present, the contracting officer then awards the contract using competitive negotiation.

Competitive negotiation starts when there’s already an official issue of requests for proposals. It is then followed by the proposals review, negotiation, revision of proposals, second review, and lastly, the awarding of a contract. 

Regardless of what process the contracting officer chose, this person mainly checks the proposals and the background of each company if they are fit for the project. 

WHAT ARE YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES?

During and after the procurement process, you must meet the business practices and ethical responsibilities imposed by the federal government. 

This includes not doing any act of bribery, false claims and statements, kickbacks, attempting to influence the award or modification of the contract, discussing employment to government officers and employees, and obtaining restricted information before the award of a contract.

This also goes the same way inside your company such as not encouraging discrimination to and between employees, following the socio-economic obligations as a government contractor, providing a subcontracting plan for small businesses, following the labor standards, and providing a drug-free workplace.

WHAT IS THE CONTRACT DISPUTE ACT?

When the contracting officer terminates or changes some parts of your contract that you didn’t agree with, you have the right to appeal these by following the Contract Dispute Act.

The act follows a process wherein you present a claim to the contracting officer regarding the action that you find unreasonable within your contract.

However, if the said person doesn’t provide a final decision regarding your dispute, you can appeal this to the US Court of Federal Claims which will then be forwarded to the Court of Appeals, and lastly to the Supreme Court, if not yet resolved.

Just remember that the government has sixty days to file an answer towards your company. And for your complaint not to be defeated, you must file it within a year after you receive the contracting officer’s final decision. 

RESOURCES

If you want to learn more about how the federal contracting process works as well as analyze the laws and rules written above, then be sure to click the links below.

https://www.justice.gov/jm/civil-resource-manual-70-contract-disputes-act

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

https://www.onvia.com/for-business/go-to-market-guidance/sealed-bids-vs-proposals-how-they-compare

https://www.sba.gov/business-guide/grow-your-business/become-federal-contractor

https://www.usa.gov/become-government-contractor

https://corporate.findlaw.com/law-library/federal-government-contract-overview.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_procurement_in_the_United_States#Law